Every answer needs a reference
Each person in the collection needs a recognisable public biography and a Wikidata entity. During review, we check that both sources refer to the same name and that the description used by the game does not come from the photograph's appearance.
We do not publish an answer based on social comments, isolated headlines or automated calculations about a face. If the documentation is ambiguous, the profile should not be part of the game.
Two links serve different purposes
The biography gives readable context: who the person is and why they are public. Wikidata provides a structured reference and helps surface identifiers or changes. Neither source is perfect; using both makes discrepancies easier to notice.
Both links appear after every answer so a player can check the record rather than trust our interface blindly.
The photograph is audited separately
Identifying a person does not grant permission to reuse their portrait. We also verify the image's original page, credited creator and licence. That information appears in the answer and in the complete credits directory.
Keeping biography and photograph separate prevents a common error: naming the subject correctly while losing attribution for the photographer's work.
Corrections with a record
Every profile links to a form carrying its identifier. A useful correction includes a source URL and explains which detail should be reviewed. A submission is recorded, but it never changes an answer automatically.
Human review protects the collection from jokes, spam and unsupported changes. When a correction is valid, the profile, credits and related copy should be updated together.